I'm trying
To write
Shorter
Poems
"..."
Dramatic...
...
...pause
In the early hours of not sleeping, these two bits of nonsense arrived:
I was going to perform a poem about graf writers and star-crossed lovers at the Adelphi the other night. But it was a bit long. Unable to bore an audience with it there and then I unveil it here and now, just for you.
Hopped on stage last night at the Adelphi to do a couple of poems - part of Write To Speak. Much fun. A couple of folk performing had never been in the legendary venue - which has seen performances by such stellar acts as Radiohead, Oasis and Pulp - before. They, like so many others before them, were quickly taken by the 'unique atmosphere' of Jacko's house and the damp aroma. A very special venue indeed. Prior to last night I was probably one of the few people of Hull to not have done some kind of performance on the Adelphi's stage. Pleased to be able to cross that off my long 'stuff to do before I'm dead' list. Naturally, any time you go to the place you wake up the following morning covered in mildew. Currently bagging up fungus to send back to Jacko.
In town filming some footage for a Larkin25 project I'm involved with. A dearth of people with anything to say, other than "never heard of him". Then a chap outside of Waterstone's starts waxing lyrical. "There's that Nick Cave song, yeah? Where he talks about Larkin being stuck in the library in Hull. I find it amazing that there's this songwriter from Aussie writing about a poet from Hull, don't you?"
At the beginning of July I took part in the Joe Hakim, Mike Watts and Cilla Wykes' organised Write To Speak Larkin-fuelled writing experiment They F**k You Up. To say I was out of my comfort zone and was stupidly nervous is something of an understatement. It was a brown trouser day for sure. Although, pop a mic in my hand and I can generally get away with it. So, because many of you didn't bother turning up, here's one of the poems I performed that night:
Hull is about to go Larkin crazy, with a several month-long celebration of, erm, the man's death. As was pointed out in The Guardian Review last month, "there will be no attempt to rebrand him as a genial figure who arrived at work each day with a spring in his step". Which is a good thing, obviously. I've just re-read an essay that Martin Amis wrote for the New Yorker in 1993 and was published in Amis's 2001 collection The War Against Cliche. The opening goes...
"In 1985, the year of his death, Philip Larkin was unquestionably England's unofficial laureate, our best-loved poet since the war: better loved qua poet, than John Betjeman, who was loved also for his charm, his famous giggle, his patrician bohemianism, and his televisual charisma, all of which Larkin notably lacked. Now, in 1993, Larkin is something like a pariah, or an untouchable. He who was beautiful is suddenly found to be ugly."
Merry Christmas everyone - back soon!